Total Pageviews

Friday, February 28, 2014

hello

Government, not disability, makes us vulnerable. That's why we fight the cuts

We welcome this Commons debate into welfare 'reform'. While our fate, like most aspects of our lives, is in the hands of others, we won't stay silent
Carers for disabled people protest against the bedroom tax outside the high court
Carers for disabled people protest against the bedroom tax outside the high court. Photograph: Dan Kitwood/Getty Images

The WOW petition read: "We call for a cumulative impact assessment of welfare reform, and a new deal for sick and disabled people based on their needs, abilities and ambitions." Some 100,000 signatures later, the government has been forced to listen. This morning, the House of Commons will have a full debate on what the "reforms" have done to the thousands who couldn't stop them.

The disabled, as a group, lumped together and picked out, is being forced to watch as £28bn is hacked from their benefits. Disabled people in poverty make up 4% of the population, but have taken 13% of this government's cuts.

Carers are facing eviction from their homes because they can't pay the rent. People too ill to work are going to payday loan companies to be able to buy food. Severely disabled people are being told social care cuts mean they can't have help to get to the toilet at night and they should lie in incontinence pads instead. This is happening in this country right now. The seventh richest in the world. No one is stopping it. It has been left to the people without power to make someone listen.

It's significant that it was via an online petition that people who are disabled or long-term ill made themselves heard; faceless behind screens, voiceless but for the keys, finding some freedom within four walls. Signing, sharing, tweeting, talking: these are the only options for people who are not given options, who did not start in a position of opportunity and dignity but have watched over the months as the scraps they had have been taken away.

It's often said the cuts are an attack on the "most vulnerable", but it's a term that suggests an inevitability to all this. Fear is not a guaranteed result of disability; desperation does not have to come with long-term sickness, just another natural symptom amongst pain and fatigue. Governments make people vulnerable: they provide the support that the disadvantaged parts of society need, or they don't. When you cannot work, you eat when those with their fingers on the purse-strings give you money, and if they don't, you go hungry. When you cannot wash yourself, you get to the bathroom when those who make the decisions send and pay for someone to help you, and if they don't, you stay in bed dirty. That is the definition of vulnerability. Ignoring it, leaving human beings to suffer alone, is, while we're at it, the definition of cruelty.

I think disabled people deserve their day in parliament. They won't, of course, be there themselves. The thousands who together got the WOW petition to be noticed will sit at home aware that the fate of their lives, as always, is in the hands of someone else: strangers, politicians – who are almost exclusively healthy and non-disabled. These MPs will have to imagine, for a moment, what life would be like if they woke up tomorrow without the security of money and health, where there's one packet of pasta in the cupboard and some off-smelling milk in the fridge and their body hasn't got the strength to cook anyway. And where the tempting radiators are the enemy because the heating bill's already in arrears and there's no choice but to go to bed at 7pm and sit wrapped up, feeling your sick bones get cold.

This is a quiet battle, with its victims shut behind doors and their weapons a keyboard and a name. But it is a battle for life that means living, not just existing. We are in a war on welfare cuts. When your own government is making you vulnerable, there is no choice but to fight.

Fw: Open Meeting, Galway, March 19th - 'Declaration for a New Republic'

 
 
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2014 3:32 PM
Subject: Open Meeting, Galway, March 19th - 'Declaration for a New Republic'
 
# Sorry for any crossposting!! #
________
Invitation to participate at an Open Meeting
'Declaration for a New Republic'
Wednesday, March 19th, 5.30-7.30pm, at SIPTU offices, Forster Court, Galway

We would like to invite you to an open meeting in Galway, discussing the idea of developing a 'Declaration for a New Republic together'. Please register NOW with Nina at nina@claimingourfuture.ie
______
There are unique moments, inspired by history which offer possibilities and hope for radical transformation in the present and future. 2016 could be one such opportunity. It will be 100 years since the Easter Rising and the proclamation of the Irish Republic. It is also likely to be the year of the next General Election. We face major challenges and questions about what type of future Ireland is going to have? What values should shape Irish society in the coming decades?

Will it remain a deeply unequal society? Austerity has resulted in poverty and deprivation, emigration and unemployment. The economy serves neither society nor the environment. Politics has reflected no appetite for transformative change and remains unresponsive to those who experience poverty and inequality. Now more than ever, we need alternatives.

Claiming Our Future is a national broad based non-party political network made up of individuals and organisations across civil society. At our inaugural conference in the RDS in 2010 over 1000 participants identified the values of equality, environmental sustainability, participation, accountability and solidarity that should be at the heart of a new Ireland.

Building on the commitment to these core values, Claiming Our Future is planning to develop a 'Declaration for a New Republic'. The development of this will take place between now and 2016 and will involve as many people as possible. This process will include public meetings, on-line interaction, a large national assembly in late 2014, and participative action, amongst other aspects.

We are inviting organisations, campaigns, communities and individuals to an open meeting on March 29th to explore what this might look like and how best to develop and promote such a Declaration. We invite you to participate to discuss, develop and shape the idea.

The meeting will address such questions as

  • What would be the purpose of a 'Declaration for a New Republic'? What should it include? How would it aid the development of alternatives?
  • How can we mobilise support for a 'Declaration for a New Republic'? How can we organise participative, grass roots level discussions to create its content?
  • What actions are required to enable the aspirations of the Declaration become real?

We are happy to meet you and discuss this further. Please register at nina@claimingourfuture.ie

--
Nina Sachau
Claiming our Future
087 3340698, nina@claimingourfuture.ie
c/o NWCI, 4th Floor, 2/3 Parnell Square East, Dublin 1
Usual working hours: Tuesday and Thursday 9.30 - 5.30
 

building regulations

Opinion: New building regulations will add costs but also peace of mind

These regulations are a quality assurance system to ensure the consumer gets what they pay for and that the properties are safe and compliant with the regulations

Thu, Feb 27, 2014, 00:00

   

On Saturday next, March 1st, new Building Control Regulations will come into force that will significantly increase the levels of accountability on professionals signing off new buildings.

The key point under the new system is the mandatory requirement for certification of buildings by "assigned certifiers". Up to now, the industry operated a system of "self-certification" which largely pertained to conveyancing and generally confirmed that there was "substantial compliance" with the building regulations as opposed to ensuring that all building standards were fully met.

The assigned certifier, who will be a chartered building surveyor, architect or engineer, initially develops a plan incorporating an inspection notification framework for the project outlining inspections, co-ordinating inputs from other professionals and ensuring that inspections and tests are carried out.

At the completion of the building project a Certificate of Compliance on Completion must be submitted to the local authority. Any changes to the initial design that have occurred must also be submitted with drawings, specifications and particulars that are relevant.

This certificate is signed by the builder and assigned certifier and confirms the inspection regime was completed and that the building is in compliance. It is not until this certificate is validated by the local authority and placed on the register that the building can be opened, used or occupied.


Latent defects 
The new system will give a clear and auditable trail of responsibility for buildings. The downside of this is that if anyone purchases a defective property under this new system they will most likely have to take the costly route through the courts to get redress in order to have their complaint dealt with. A latent defects scheme would avoid the consumer incurring such costs.

Latent defects insurance provides a single point through which to recover the costs of repairing, replacing and or strengthening the premises following discovery of an inherent defect. The consumer could have a complaint dealt with in an efficient and inexpensive manner without incurring excessive costs. This is something that should be given serious consideration to by Government.

The new building regulations regime will have both a direct and indirect cost on the construction of new homes. The direct cost of constructing a new home will increase as a result of the new regulations in terms of materials and inspections by the assigned certifier, which will be ultimately borne by the consumer.

Essentially, these regulations are a quality assurance system to ensure the consumer gets what they pay for and that the properties are safe and compliant with the regulations. While that may cost more in the short term, the longer term benefits are clear.

There is also a potential conflict of interest in the new regime in that the assigned certifier can be an employee of the developer as long as he or she is one of the three applicable professionals previously mentioned.

This is something to be avoided as there is no real independent oversight in such cases and this contravenes the purpose of the assigned certifier whose role is to ensure the building standards are fully met. In my opinion, a prudent purchaser should investigate who the assigned certifier is to avoid this situation occurring.

A key issue in ensuring that the standards are complied with in the interests of the public will be the adequate resourcing of local authorities to carry out inspections and administration. Traditionally, the building control system suffered resource issues and struggled to achieve 15 per cent rates of inspection.

The allocation of local authority resources for higher targeted inspection levels needs to be given serious consideration to ensure compliance and it will be incumbent on the Government to ensure an appropriate review of operations occurs in this respect.

Currently, there is a voluntary registration scheme for builders set up by theConstruction Industry Federation. The requirements to become "registered" appear to be stringent and will provide some comfort to the consumer. It is hoped that this scheme will be put on a statutory footing, which would further ensure a higher standard of construction.

The potential downside of this is that only a "registered builder" will be able to sign off the certificate of compliance. This will most definitely make it difficult for people undertaking self-builds to get compliance on their properties.

One final point would be that these regulations may not be the finished article and may need to evolve and adapt in the future to better serve the public. It is important the building industry and the Government overlords continue to work together to ensure safe and well-built homes are being provided for future generations.


Kevin Hollingsworth is chairman of the building surveying professional group of the Society of Chartered Surveyors Ireland, scsi.ie

Tuesday, February 25, 2014

Fw: International Design for All Foundation Awards 2014

 
 
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2014 12:10 PM
Subject: International Design for All Foundation Awards 2014
 

Logo: Design for All Foundation

Good for everybody, easy for you

International Design for All Foundation Awards 2014
Winners Announced

 

International Design for All Foundation Award Ceremony 2014

Design for All Foundation Award Winners 2014 with Francesc Aragall, Jean-Marc Maillet Contoz and Isabelle VérilhacOn 12 February 2014, during the Urbaccess accessibility and universal design fair in Paris, the Design for All Foundation award ceremony took place. The event, introduced by Jean-Marc Maillet-Contoz , Urbaccess Co-Director and Handirect Editor, was attended by a large number of international representatives from government, education centres, businesses and not-for-profit organisations .... read more

You can find more news and events by visiting our websites: Design for All Foundation, Towns and Cities for All, Museum for All and User-Centred Business.

Send your opinions and proposals foundation@designforall.org

Design for All Foundation, C/ Piquer, 29, Baixos 1
08004 - Barcelona - Tel. +34 93 470 51 18 - Fax +34 93 371 76 49

Become a member | Subscribe | Amend details | Unsubscribe

 

Monday, February 24, 2014

Fw: USMS News Releases

 
 
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2014 6:10 PM
Subject: USMS News Releases
 

You are subscribed to Announcements and News Releases for U.S. Marshals. This information has recently been updated, and is now available.

02/24/2014 12:19 PM EST
 
February 20, 2014 - Suspected child predator Michael Perez was apprehended today in New Mexico. A warrant was issued for Perez on charges including: 6 counts of Criminal Sexual Penetration of a Minor, 3 counts of Kidnapping, 3 counts of Intimidation of a Witness, Tampering with Evidence, and 7 counts of Contributing to the Delinquency of a Minor.
02/24/2014 12:18 PM EST
 
February 20, 2014 - A mother who allegedly abused her medically troubled child to death is being brought back to Shelby County to face justice thanks to the U.S. Marshals Task Force. Andrea Ruth, aged 12, was neglected by her parents, Errol Johnson and Raven Ruth, to the point she developed gangrene in her legs and passed away. Warrants were issued for Johnson and Ruth for First Degree Murder and Aggravated Child Abuse.
02/24/2014 12:17 PM EST
 
February 20, 2014 - U.S. Marshal Martin J. Pane announced that the United States Marshals Service Task Force arrested armed robbery suspect Cory Clark in Thomasville, Pennsylvania.
02/24/2014 12:16 PM EST
 
February 20, 2014 - The U.S. Marshal's Southern Ohio Fugitive Apprehension Strike Team arrested Karl Davis Coleman. A Montgomery County grand jury indicted Coleman on Murder, Felonious Assault, Rape, Attempted Rape, and Tampering with Evidence.
02/24/2014 12:04 PM EST
 
February 20, 2014 - Sydney Jackson, an accused Memphis murderer, fled from Memphis to Wisconsin to Chicago, and was preparing to travel to Nashville when the U.S. Marshals Task Force caught up with him. A warrant was issued for the arrest of Jackson on January 27, 2014 for the First Degree Murder of Corteras Wilbourn.

This email was sent to thomaschambers@eircom.net using GovDelivery, on behalf of: U.S. Marshals · U.S. Department of Justice · 950 Pennsylvania Ave., NW · Washington, DC 20530 · 800-439-1420

ill

Man who was too ill to attend fit-for-work interview but terrified of losing benefits dies after Atos test

CHARLIE McGARVEY'S seriously ill brother Terry, 48, attended his Atos assessment and then had to be taken to hospital where he died the following day.

David Johnstone Photography
Charley McGarvey's brother Terry was hauled into Atos assessment

A SERIOUSLY ill man died hours after he was hauled into an Atos fit-for-work assessment.

Terry McGarvey knew he wasn't well enough to attend the hearing. But he was terrified his benefits would be stopped if he didn't turn up.

He dragged himself to the assessment but had to be taken to hospital in an ambulance. Terry, 48, died the next day.

His brother Charlie, 50, said: "He said he felt terrible and didn't think he could leave the house.

"But he was worried they'd take his benefits away if he didn't go.

"When he went in, he sat down with a young woman who started asking him questions.

"I pointed out that he needed an ambulance, not a medical.

"They put us into a room next door and lay him on a bed. We waited more than an hour for the ambulance without anyone coming in to even ask how he was."

Terry, who had blood disorder polycytheamia, died in Glasgow's Victoria Infirmary from pneumonia last month. His death certificate also lists liver disease.

Charlie, from Glasgow, said Atos's trained medical assessors should have realised his brother, a former lorry driver, was dangerously ill.

He added: "I think that if they had a doctor in there, they would have got an ambulance immediately.

"The girl who was supposed to be doing the examination never brought out a stethoscope or anything. They just put him in the room next door and that was the last we saw of her."

An Atos spokesman said: "We would like to express our condolences to Mr McGarvey and 
his family.

As soon as we were made aware that Mr McGarvey had taken ill, we offered our assistance and called for an ambulance."

A spokesman for the Scottish Ambulance Service said: "The call was clinically triaged as a non-emergency based on detailed information provided by the caller.

"The caller was advised that the response to a non-emergency call at that time could take up to an hour but to call 999 again if the patient'scondition deteriorated."

On Friday, victims of fit-to-work tests welcomed the news that Atos are ending their contract to carry out 
Work Capability Assesments for the Department for Work and Pensions.

Thousands of seriously ill and vulnerable people have been deemed fit to work by the tests, only for the verdicts to be overturned on appeal.