Clear Violation of EU Regulation Leads to Discrimination of Passengers With Disabilities

Clear Violation of EU Regulation Leads to Discrimination of Passengers With Disabilities
15/04/2011 | 0 comments

Last week flight passenger Shuaib Chalklen was refused to board flight number LX353 London- Geneva on the grounds of his disability.

The airlines motives for refusing this passenger stand in direct violation of EU law governing the rights of disabled persons and persons with reduced mobility when traveling by air. On Monday, Vice President of the Commission responsible for transport Siim Kallas released a report on the functioning and effect of this regulation. This report additionally demonstrates the gravity of such discriminatory behavior.

Freedom of movement is the EDF’s top campaign in 2011, therefore, in response to this incident, the disability movement calls on the EU to step up its monitoring of EU law and for a clear definition of concepts to improve the journey for 80 million persons with disabilities.

On Monday 4th April, UN Special Rapporteur on Disability and wheelchair user, Shuaib Chalklen was informed that if he planned to travel unaccompanied he would be denied boarding his flight LX 353 London-Geneva. The rationale behind this threat issued by the Swiss Air Medical Department was that the passenger could not independently use the sanitary facilities.

The standard flight time for this route, from London to Geneva is 1h40 and Mr Chalklen is a frequent and thus experienced flyer yet, he was refused access on the grounds of his disability.

The Report from the European Commission
Transport Commissioner Kallas published a report on this regulation, mentioning that ‘some carriers tend to mix up requirements related to flight safety’. The Commission repeats that ‘if boarding is denied for safety reasons, this must be done solely for flight safety reasons,’ recognizing that there are still problems with the implementation of the regulation and hinting towards the misuse of the rules.

This incident is a prime example of the discriminatory attitudes persons with disabilities face on a daily basis when traveling. In response to this case, Vice President Kallas clearly stated that the series of measures contained in the commission report, released earlier this week, intended to clarify and strengthen their rights, with the purpose to ‘avoid situations where people with a disability or reduced mobility are unduly refused access