Total Pageviews

Thursday, January 31, 2013

Fw:

 
 
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 5:01 PM
 

 

Ballina continues to address disability issues.

 

The "fantastic Vision" of Bus Eireann in refurbishing its Ballina station was highlighted at Ballina Town Council on Thursday last during a discussion of the Barcelona declaration.

Independent councilor and An Meara, Mary Kelly, stated that the 1m upgrade of Ballina Bus Station now makes it the 'best example in this town of a building facilitating people with disabilities' Cllr Kelly added that the extensive revamp unveiled recently by transport Minister martin Cullen, is a credit to Bus Eireann and possibly the finest of its kind in the country. She urged other businesses in Ballina to "follow suit".

Cllr Kelly made her comments at last Thursday Nights meeting of Ballina Town Council where Fianna Fail Councilor Johnnie O Malley and Sinn Fein councilor Peter Clarke were nominated to represent the council on the Barcelona Declaration Committee.

The Council previously adopted the principles of the Barcelona Declaration in June 2003.

The 1995 declaration stresses "the essential nature of the  development of human resources, both as regards the education and training of young people in particular and in the area of culture " Staff at Bus Eireann in Ballina were given disability training as part of the refurbishment. Which also includes automatic doors, large toilets suitable for wheelchairs, Level and ramped footpaths, signage displays and extra lighting?

The Barcelona Declaration furthermore spotlights the need to "respect human rights and fundamental freedoms and guarantees the effective, legitimate exercises of such rights and freedoms, including freedom of expression, freedom of association for peaceful purposes and freedom of thought, conscience and religion"

Under the principles of the convention, a committee is to conduct a traffic study around Ballina has been put in place, with a view to addressing the needs and rights of persons with disabilities.

"The remit of the committee is to look at the whole of the town, not just look at the buildings" stated Cllr O Malley, who was proposed and seconded by Frances Mc Andrew and Peter Clarke respectively." I would encourage people with disabilities to come to the committee. This is very important because these people see things in a different perspective"

Cllr O Malley proposed Cllr Peter Clarke for a position on the committee, and fine Gael councilor Mark Winters seconded this proposal. Accepting the position, Sinn Fein councilor asked Town Manager, Seamus Granahan, what specifically has been done for people with disabilities since the declaration adoption in2003.he also enquired if the council consults with people with disabilities when considering alterations?

Mr Granahan responded that the council has endeavored to make all new public buildings accessible, but that council architects' relied on building regulations in effecting changes aimed at making buildings user-friendly for people with disabilities' encouraged the committee now in place to form a brief and bring it to the council, adding that the council would do what it could to assist.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Thomas Chambers
Access Campaigner
The Billy Ranch
Newport
Mayo

 

 

086 3552047
098 41545

Thursday, January 24, 2013

Fw: Wheelchair Rugby Euro Qualifiers - Help Required!

 
 
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 12:48 AM
Subject: Wheelchair Rugby Euro Qualifiers - Help Required!
 

Dear Friends,

Your charisma and connections are hereby being called upon to elevate exposure and footfall for the upcoming Wheelchair Rugby European Qualifiers in Gormanstown College, Co. Meath on February 7th-9th . This promises to be the biggest Paralympic event on these shores in 2013 and with your help it will be talked about for many years to come.

Your mission should you choose to accept it

Is to raise the profile of this event and disability sport across all your available mediums, from work colleagues, friends, family and available web and social media. The main objective is to increase footfall over the 3 days with a particular focus on children to meet paralysis on a sporting platform. Nothing generates a cauldron or noise like a hall full of screaming kids and admission is free for everyone! The IRFU have given us a massive batch of flags and we will have drums, face painters and balloon artists etc on site with a huge focus on family fun. With that in mind anyone with any close connections in schools are invaluable, many schools are already sending out a cross section of classes and transition years.

Attached is the event poster with the schedule and fixtures. Even if it's not realistic for you to travel to the event due to your geographic location here in Ireland, it would be great if you could spread the word and print off some flyers to put up around your area to help raise the awareness of Wheelchair Rugby in Ireland.


This will be a very rewarding few days to get to know the stories behind the chairs of spinal injury athletes from across Europe.

I realise this is a big ask but any help you can give us will be vital to the overall success of the competition.

So C'mon and let's get behind our "Wheels in Green!"

All the best,

Garrett

 

Fw: brave deaf man --who took on a big disability group

 
 
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 8:17 AM
To: DPOC ; Dpoc Reception ; Martina Halpin ; Angela Meere ; Donal & Cathy Cooper ; Michael Corbett ; rexlee@eircom.net ; mick keegan ; frank forgarty ; ShaneHogan ; Kirsi Hanifin ; Breda O'Sullivan ; gcil@eircom.net ; Joe Higgins ; 'Susan OBrien' ; Mary mooney ; Margaret Elomari ; M G ; Michael Gogarty ; thomaschambers@eircom.net ; Thomas Connole ; Anne Marie Healy ; Ann Marie O'Connell ; anncroninennis@gmail.com ; Patrick Lillis ; Pat Lillis ; Desiree Stevenson ; maureen hand ; jim ; corkcil@eircom.net ; 'Nicola Meacle' ; croke.margaret@gmail.com ; Sean McDonnell ; greg.duff@advocacy.ieanthony ; Josephine Keaveney - R5 Advocacy Service Manager ; jose.keaveney@gmail.com ; helenliddy1@eircom.net ; Ann Marie Flanagan ; malachy foots ; Malachy Foots ; Patrick.collins@cronans.ie ; helen.collins@advocacy.ie ; Marian Hayes
Subject: brave deaf man --who took on a big disability group
 
Hello.

Well done to this guy who took on the IWA and my guess is there is a lot of this silent discrimination against disabled people with in organization of disability.
Low level bullying and undocumented discrimination.


Slan

Dermot

Wheelchair body pays €10,000 for discrimination

 134  84  38

 

A major advocate for the disabled has been ordered to pay a deaf man €10,000 in compensation after a tribunal found that it discriminated against him on the basis of disability.

The Irish Wheelchair Association (IWA) was found by the Equality Tribunal to have discriminated against Kevin Stanley on the grounds of disability contrary to the Employment Equality Acts by failing to provide "reasonable accommodation" for his disability when he was invited to a job interview.

Mr Stanley, former manager of the Irish Deaf Society, had claimed that he was discriminated against by the IWA by failing to allow him sufficient time to book an Irish sign language (ISL) interpreter to attend a job interview with him.

Mr Stanley, who is an assistant project researcher for the Irish Congress of Trade Unions, said he not only feels personally vindicated by the decision but believes it is a win for the entire deaf community in Ireland.

He said last night: "I was disappointed and hurt by the refusal of the IWA to reasonably accommodate a difficulty that is no fault of mine."

Officials from the IWA did not comment on the matter last night.

Irish Independent

 


Wednesday, January 23, 2013

Ballina town

My name is Tom Chambers from Newport, County Mayo. In 1981, I had a very severe accident that paralyzed me from chest down to my feet. Prior to that, I worked in the building and construction industry all over Europe. In 2005, I completed an audit course on access and audit of buildings which was ran by the University of Ulster. Presently, I am an independent access campaign officer who work and audit buildings and public offices and places in order to promote universal access for all. As a matter of fact my name came up for praise in Brussels on the 3rd of December 2012 for work and advice I gave to organisations when they were electing the most accessible city in Europe.

I felt I could put my experience to use when I saw a copy of the Plan for Peter Street in Ballina. Like everyone else, I was excited about the plan to make disabled parking bay and I put in my submissions for the work. When the work was completed, I called to have a look but was very disappointed to find out that the visually impaired and wheelchair drivers were not provided in the plan for the disable parking bay.

The work to my mind is a disgrace and I challenge everyone at the meeting tonight to prove me wrong. When I was asked to find the best place to locate a designated parking bay outside the Art Centre, I made my submission and was disappointed to find out that the bay is totally not accessible for wheelchair drivers.  How can a disabled driver/passenger transfer from his/her car when the bay is just the width of the bay cutting off access to the footpath. It has not even got a sigh to identify the bay as one approach it?

 

A survey was carried out by the National Disability Authorities (NDA) for the government in 2011 and was launched by Minister Howlin at a presentation in Dublin last June to which I attended, regarding people with disabilities and the general public and this is what he had to say when it was put to him that the respect is almost 75% and this is what he had to say:

 

I was disheartened to learn that attitudes to people with disabilities have actually deteriorated, as indicated in the most recent report of the NDA. One would have thought that the natural progression is for people to have a greater understanding of disability issues and to be embracing citizenship in the fullest sense.

Public service bodies have a responsibility to be leaders in challenging negative attitudes by ensuring greater understanding and awareness of disability and how to deliver services better to customers with disabilities.

As I've already mentioned, by understanding the needs of as many customers as possible and the wide range of abilities; all of us are disabled in some way ‑‑ and by designing our services to be as accessible as possible, we can deliver better services that meet the needs of all citizens.

 

What really annoys me is the sign on the wall at the bus depot on the Castlebar to Ballina that says "this is the beginning of an accessible town" when there was no planning for the old and disabled when carrying out work at Peter Street. I had the chance to visit a few cities in Europe last year and amongst them were Vienna (winners for the most accessible city in Europe for 2011) and Salzburg winners in 2012 and this was done by NO tactile something we in Ireland  feel is needed. How many people with disabilities have approached anyone here at this meeting requesting more tactile or have any of you tried to manoeuvre a wheelchair on them.

 

So as you prepare for your coming budget why not consider the true experts on access and listen to what they have to say and bring them aboard like they do in other countries that get it right and forget about your pride because some of us voted for you. We were born by illness or accident, but we are handicapped by the environment.

 

OUR MOTTO IS: "Nothing about us   without us"

 

Kind regard

Thomas Chambers
Access Campaigner
The Billy Ranch
Newport

Mayo

Email: thomaschambers@eircom.net

www.thomaschambers.blogspot.com

086 35520407

0899674346
098 41545

 

 

Tuesday, January 22, 2013

Fw: Your January 2013 Claiming our Future Newsletter

 
 
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2013 1:54 PM
To: Thomas
Subject: Your January 2013 Claiming our Future Newsletter
 
Claiming Our Future's Logo

Thomas


You can take part in 'National Day of Action' or attend a workshop on 'Alternatives for Transformation'

Claiming Our Future had a busy end to 2012. The Plan B working group was involved in the national budget debate, promoting our Plan B analysis. A Claiming Our Future Assembly was held in November. After this an expanded coordination group met twice (in December and January) to develop, refine and strengthen our work and organisation into 2013.  It was agreed that the Plan B, Income Inequality, Democracy and Economy for Society working groups would continue their work. Particular importance was given to taking new steps to improve our overall communication/ co-ordination and our use of I.T and social media, and to better enable local participation.

An Invitation to Participate:

  1. Claiming Our Future is supporting the National Day of Action being organised by Congress on 9th February 2013. The focus for this National Day of Action is the issue of the unacceptable debt burden placed on the Irish people and the need for the ESM rescue fund to take on banking debt. The aim for the day is to send a strong message to the European Union on this issue. Marches and rallies will be held in Dublin, Cork, Galway, Limerick, Sligo and Waterford. Details on the events are available on www.ictu.ie. We hope that you might be able to participate and to encourage others to do so.

    Download a letter from David Begg of Congress on the National Day of Action. This includes an invitation to a planning meeting on 25th January at 2pm in Congress.
     
  2. Claiming Our Future is supporting the hosting a workshop on 'Alternatives for Transformation' with acclaimed academic Erik Olin Wright from the University of Wisconsin, Madison. Erik Olin Wright will speak on 'Transforming Capitalism through Real Utopias'. Workshops will allow participants to explore and build practical Irish alternatives across different areas including the finance, production, economic, care, social, democratic and environment sectors. The workshop will be held in the Iontas Building, NIRSA conference room, NUI Maynooth from 10am to 5pm on Saturday March 9th 2013.

    Download a preliminary notice for the event with further details.



 


Claiming our Future


To find out more or to help  email info@claimingourfuture.ie

Visit our website for more information on how you can get involved.


Regards


Claiming our Future

Unsubscribe thomaschambers@eircom.net from this list | Forward to a friend | Update your profile


You are receiving this email because you were a participant of the Oct 30th event, or have signed up to our mailing list on our website. You may also be recieving it if you signed the petition to save the minimum wage and asked for updates about it and other campaigns. This email is for the intended recipient only - under Data Protection guidelines we ask you to not forward this email to other individuals without their prior consent. If you would no longer like to recieve any emails from Claiming Our Future please click on unsubscribe above.

Our mailing address is:
Claiming our Future
44 Lower Gardiner Street
Dublin, Dublin 01
Ireland

Add us to your address book

Copyright (C) 2013 Claiming our Future All rights reserved.

Monday, January 21, 2013

Fw: Cllr Keith Martin's Blog

 
 
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2013 1:14 PM
Subject: Cllr Keith Martin's Blog
 

Cllr Keith Martin's Blog


My Letter to the Labour Party TDs and Senators

Posted: 20 Jan 2013 06:07 PM PST

Dear Party Colleague,

I write to you to ask for your assistance in opposing the abolition of town councils.

The Minster has repeatedly stated "That there are too many councils and councillors" for a country the size of Ireland.

The fact of the matter is that the ratio is 1 councillor per 118 per head of population per Councillor in France, 250 per head of population in Sweden and 350 in Germany. This rises to 610 in Spain and 1100 per head of population in Greece and Belgium.

In fact only the UK has a lower ratio of councillors to citizens than Ireland.

The reform proposes to make this situation worse by increasing the ratio from 1 councillor per 2,336 to 1 councillor per 4,800.  Making us the most under-represented country in the European Union.

The AMAI and An Bord Snip Nua estimate the total saving from abolishing 75 town councils and 700 councillors is just €6 million; that's a saving of just €80k per council. 

To put that in perspective, Westport Town Council's annual budget is €5.2 million per year and our Capital account is just under €5m.

The Minister's repeated claims of savings of hundreds of millions are actually derived from cost savings of shared equipment and manpower and the redundancies of 500 Public servants.

The Minister says he is abolishing 80 councils but the truth is he is actually creating more councils than ever before.  Mayo goes from 4 local authorities to 5.

In 2011 "The Case for Town Local Government in Ireland in the 21st Century", was carried out by researchers at University College Cork.  That study found that town and borough councils are significantly less reliant on central government funding compared to city and county councils, yet are regularly targeted for exchequer cutbacks.

Town Councils, Borough Councils and City Councils which have existed separately for centuries in the interests of savings only, taking in no account the historical, economic, cultural, social and morale impact of such a move.  Meanwhile Dublin is to be left as 4 separate local authorities for no good reason.

No effort has been made to differentiate between effective, efficient and successful councils and other less effective councils.

Under the reforms there's no guarantee that the Westport Town Budget of €5.2m will be spent in the area in future and it seems likely that our Capital account of €5m will be used to offset Mayo County Council's €50m debt.

Westport Town Council budget is currently made up of just 15% funding from Central Government.  This will be replaced with the new property tax which will mean that Westport Town Council will be completely independent of Central Government funding.

Westport Town Council has, historically always presented an annual surplus in our budgets and has built up a Capital Reserve of €5m.

The cost of the 9 Councillors of Westport Town Council, salaries, expenses, conferences, overseas visits, hospitality comes to less than .75 of a percent.

One County Councillor chairing an SPC and taking full advantage of their conference allowance costs more.

The abolition of Westport Town Council will serve no purpose, save no money and will not put people first.  The abolition of an entire tier of local government is unheard of in modern European history.

In relation to the Minister's claims that the new Municipal Councils will be real councils in their own right why does he not count them as local authorities?  He has repeatedly stated he is cutting the number of local authorities when in fact he is going to be creating even more councils.

Surely if these Municipal Councils are to be councils in their own right then they should have separate elections? The issues facing the Westport area are different to those facing Mayo County Council.  Yet there is a Dual Mandate.  These new councils will not even have the power to set a rate.

The truth of the matter is that our party went into government pledging to empower town councils and to create new town councils. 

According to our 2009 Local Government Manifesto "Local Authorities (including County, Town, and District Councils) would retain their existing functions, with other appropriate functions to be devolved over time".

According to our Local Government policy, New Councils, "There should be two levels of Local Government: Regional Authorities, which would include City Authorities for the larger cities, and Local Authorities, which would include County, Town and District Councils".

That same policy also proposed that " The distinction between County Councils and the larger Town Councils should be ended. All such councils should have the same status. There would be options available to people as to the type of Council which would exist in a particular area, as between County Councils, Town Councils and District Councils. Where a dispute arises over the inclusion of an area in a council, the issue could be resolved by plebiscite of the voters in that area."

Instead there has been no debate save for a very brief call for public submission.  There has been no debate within the Labour Party and as a serving Town Councillor my opinions were not sought nor was I informed of the abolition of my council until it was announced.  

There are tough decisions to be made, but we must be sure that we are making them for the right reason.  The abolition of Town Councils cannot be undone or corrected at a later date.

I ask for your help in highlighting the myths surrounding the proposals and for your help in opposing the abolition of the councils so that their retention can be built into the proposed reforms and that we deliver a system of local government fit for purpose.

I attach our submission to the Minister which outlines Westport Town Council's achievements and the many reasons why we should not be abolished.

 

Sincerely

 

___________

Keith Martin

Saturday, January 19, 2013

Fw: Cllr Keith Martin's Blog

 
 
Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2013 1:16 PM
Subject: Cllr Keith Martin's Blog
 

Cllr Keith Martin's Blog


Fwd: Submission on Joint Policing Committees

Posted: 19 Jan 2013 02:47 AM PST

Cllr Keith Martin has called on members of the Westport Community to make their feelings know in relation to the successes or otherwise of the system of Local Policing Committees.

In his own submission to the Dept of Justice, Cllr Martin says the committees are too big, ineffective and powerless with TDs and other representatives "show-boating" for the press while the important issues of policing are not dealt with due to privacy or budgetary issues.

Cllr Martin is calling for smaller policing committees, without TDs, which would have some form of budget and an ability to discuss individuals and items in privacy outside of the public meetings.  He has also called for a shake up of national policing.

Cllr Martin is reacting to the call for submission from the Minister for Justice, Equality and Defence, Alan Shatter TD, who is seeking views from the Gardaí, local authorities, Oireachtas members, community organisations and the general public.

Joint Policing Committees are established under the Garda Síochána Act 2005 and are designed to allow for collective consideration of local policing issues between the Gardaí, local authority and Oireachtas elected members, officials and community representatives.

Submissions in relation to the Discussion Points outlined in this document or any other matters relating to the operation of JPCs may be sent by e-mail to jpc@justice.ie or by post to: JPC Review, Department of Justice and Equality, 94 St Stephen's Green, Dublin 2.  Please note submissions must arrive by the end of January, 2013.

Cllr Martin's Submission:
 
1.  There are far to many members on the committees.  The bigger the committee the less it does.  A maximum number should be set with each body nominating its representatives to that committee.
  
2. The inclusion of Oireachtas members is unnecessary.  Local Policing is a matter for local government not national politicians.  There is no justification for TDs/Senators, tasked with national affairs from serving on a local committee like this.  They do not serve on any other similar body.
 
3.  The value of many of the community/voluntary members is minimal and should be targeted at the organisations which are relevant.
 
4.  There is a danger that they are nothing more than talking shops whereby show-boating for the press takes precedent over action.
 
5.  Because they are public meetings the discussions are too limited.  While policing policy should be debated in public, individual cases and items cannot be.
 
6. Without specific bugeting powers there's little that can be done differently anyway.  Any changes are often an issue of "Robbing Peter to pay Paul" when it comes to resources. 
 
7.  Policing should be devolved to local councils or regions as it is in the UK.  This would allow greater freedom for innovation, imaginative budgeting and reaction to different types of crime due to rural-urban divide.  What works in the Phoenix Park does not work in the villages of Mayo.
 
Keith Martin
Councillor
Westport Town Council
 
 
 

Submission on Joint Policing Committees

Posted: 19 Jan 2013 02:32 AM PST

1.  There are far to many members on the committees.  The bigger the committee the less it does.  A maximum number should be set with each body nominating its representatives to that committee.
  
2. The inclusion of Oireachtas members is unnecessary.  Local Policing is a matter for local government not national politicians.  There is no justification for TDs/Senators, tasked with national affairs from serving on a local committee like this.  They do not serve on any other similar body.
 
3.  The value of many of the community/voluntary members is minimal and should be targeted at the organisations which are relevant.
 
4.  There is a danger that they are nothing more than talking shops whereby show-boating for the press takes precedent over action.
 
5.  Because they are public meetings the discussions are too limited.  While policing policy should be debated in public, individual cases and items cannot be.
 
6. Without specific bugeting powers there's little that can be done differently anyway.  Any changes are often an issue of "Robbing Peter to pay Paul" when it comes to resources. 
 
7.  Policing should be devolved to local councils are regions as it is in the UK.  This would allow greater freedom for innovation, imaginative budgeting and reaction to different types of crime due to rural-urban divide.  What works in the Phoenix Park does not work in the villages of Mayo.
 
Keith Martin
Councillor
Westport Town Council
 
 

Friday, January 18, 2013

Fw: Cllr Keith Martin's Blog

 
 
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 1:06 PM
Subject: Cllr Keith Martin's Blog
 

Cllr Keith Martin's Blog


Re: My address to the AMAI

Posted: 18 Jan 2013 01:28 AM PST

First of all I'd like to welcome you to Westport and this meeting.  It's good of you to come at such short notice.

 

We on this council feel very strongly about this issue and about the AMAI's reaction and its good to have this opportunity to speak to you.

 

This council rejects the reforms as flawed and we do not accept that municipal councils are successors or replacements for town councils.

 

I have a number of questions in relation to the proposed abolition, the AMAI's reaction and future course of action in this matter.

 

I'd like to start by getting you to bust some myths for us in public in relation to Town Councils and Municipal Government.

 

Firstly the Minster has repeatedly stated and I quote "That there are too many councils and councillors" for a country the size of Ireland.

 

 The ratio is 1 councillor per 118 per head of population per Councillor in France, 250 per head of population in Sweden and 350 in Germany. This rises to 610 in Spain and 1100 per head of population in Greece and Belgium.

 

That only the UK has a lower ratio of councillors to citizens that Ireland?

 

 

The reform proposes to make this situation worse by increasing the ratio from 1 councillor per 2,336 to 1 councillor per 4,800.

 

 

The AMAI and An Bord Snip estimate the total saving from abolishing 75 town councils and 700 councillors is just €6 million; that's a saving of just €80k per council.

 

 

That the Minister's repeated claims of savings of hundreds of millions are actually derived from cost savings of shared equipment and manpower and the redundancies of 500 Public servants

 

The Minister says he is abolishing 80 councils but the truth is he is actually creating more councils than ever before?   if we are to believe that these municipal councils are anything more than grandiose local area committees?

 

 

 

In August of 2011 the AMAI PUBLISHED THE FINDINGS OF A REPORT

 

"The Case for Town Local Government in Ireland in the 21st Century", was carried out by researchers at University College Cork 

 

The study claims that town and borough councils are significantly less reliant on central government funding compared to city and county councils, yet are regularly targeted for exchequer cutbacks. 

 

The report points out that the more successful economies in the developed world all have a vibrant system of town government at the heart of their public administration systems. 

 

"Ireland needs a more comprehensive tier of town or community government covering the entire country. Currently we have too few town councils and quite often they carry the can for the ineffectiveness of county councils," said the AMAI.

 

 

 

Town Councils, Borough Councils and City Councils which have existed separately for centuries in the interests of savings only, taking in no account the historical, economic, cultural, social and morale impact of such a move.  Meanwhile Dublin is to be left as 4 separate local authorities for no good reason.

 

 

No effort has been made to differentiate between effective, efficient and successful councils and other less effective councils.

 

 

 

 

 

Under the reforms there's no guarantee that the Westport Town Budget of over €5m will be spent in the area in future?

 

And that the savings of this council will most likely be handed over the County Council rather than be retained by the Municipal Council?

 

 

How does the AMAI go from calling for more town councils and councillors to the position of "welcoming the reform of local government while regretting the loss of 40% of Cllrs.  How can you welcome any reform which sees what you have proved is the most efficient form of local government and councillor.

 

How can you welcome any part of that?

 

When I heard of the abolition of this town council I emailed the AMAI and asked what the AMAI had done to fight this I received a one line reply

 

"What more could we have done?"

 

Do you think that is an adequate response?

 

The AMAI has failed to reverse its welcome for the reforms.

It has not publicly corrected the minister's propaganda

It has not organised a media campaign or even a protest meeting or petition.

 

 

Now we see the 5 Bourough Councils have banded together and made financial provision for action and a campaign to fight their aboltion.

 

Not a word of support from the AMAI for that.

 

The AMAI who should be a conduit for news and a campaign of resistence is silent expect for circulating requests for us to fill in submissions for boundaries

 

 

Meanwhile, President of the AMAI Willie Callaghan said he is disappointed that representatives of the association were not invited to last night's meeting in Midleton.

Speaking on RTÉ's Morning Ireland, Mr Callaghan said the association will take legal advice once the Bill is published, but this was not yet an option.

He said he was surprised a town or county manager would allow taxpayers' money to be used for taking a case.

That statement is a slap in th face to councils like Middleton in Cork who have put aside 50,000 for a legal case and Westport which has put aside 5,000 to support a court challenge or campaign against abolition.

 

 

The constitution is a living document.

 

There are un-numerated rights under the constitution, like free speech which are not written into it but have been implied to exist within it. 

 

Even if not intended a referendum can create unexpected changes to the referendum.

 

The local government amendment to the constitution could have created an implied right of protection for town councils, even if that was not the aim or intention of the referendum.

 

Chief Law officer of the state when a Senior Counsel advised that there were no constitutional implications or bars to ending Upward only rent reviews.  However on becoming Attorney General that same person advised the government that there WERE constitutional issues in relation to ending Upward only rent reviews.

 

If a SC counsel cannot be sure on an issue like this then we must persue our options through the court to see if there is any implied protection for our councils under the constitution.

 

i love local democracy and I love the fact that any citizen of this town can run for  office and change things if they wish.  the new system will create a power sub class of powerful full time councillors and with councils the size of county Louth people will need financial backing and a team of supporters to have any chance.  It is a bad day for democracy if that happens.

 

We must fight that.

 



On 18 January 2013 09:28, Councillor Keith Martin <councillorkeithmartin@gmail.com> wrote:
My address to the AMAI last night at Westport Town Council's January Meeting.
 
K
 

My address to the AMAI

Posted: 18 Jan 2013 01:28 AM PST

My address to the AMAI last night at Westport Town Council's January Meeting.
 
K

Fw: Yesterday's Order of Business

 
 
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 10:27 AM
Subject: Re: Fw: Yesterday's Order of Business
 
Dermot
A load of rubbish from Kathleen Lynch - We were told ,seems many years ago, the UN Convention would be signed off in this Dail session etc etc.  The only thing halting Ireland ratifying was Mental Capacity Bill, so what is all this from Minister of State Lynch - nothing more than excuses.? By the time Ireland ratifies it probably will be UN Convention on Old People with Disabilities!!!!!!!!
 
 
Regards
 
Malachy

On 18 January 2013 08:31, Dermot M.J.Hayes <hayes.ennis@eircom.net> wrote:
 
The struggles goes on and on.
Lets up the campaign.
Slan

Comrade

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Fw: Yesterday's Order of Business
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 11:28:27 +0000
From: Michael McNamara mailto:Michael.McNamara@Oireachtas.ie
To: Dermot M.J.Hayes mailto:hayes.ennis@eircom.net


Dermot,    Please see reply from Minister Kathleen Lynch's office regarding the issue   I raised in the Order of Business in the Dáil yesterday.    Regards,  MMN  Michael McNamara, T.D.  Dáil Éireann,  Leinster House,  Kildare Street,  Dublin 2     tel (01) 6184879    Q   Deputy Michael McNamara: I have questions regarding two items of   legislation. The programme for Government contains a commitment to ratify   the convention on persons with a disability, for which a wide range of   legislative changes are required. When will a Bill be brought forward to   make the changes required in order that Ireland can proceed with ratifying   the convention on the rights of persons with a disability.      The Tánaiste: It is intended that the gender recognition Bill will be   introduced this year. With regard to ratification of the agreements and   the convention on disability, I will ask the Minister of State, Deputy   Kathleen Lynch, to reply directly to the Deputy.       ----- Forwarded by Edel Carroll/Oireachtas on 17/01/2013 11:12 -----    From:   Adrian_McLaughlin@health.gov.ie  To:     michael.mcnamara@oir.ie  Cc:     David.King@taoiseach.gov.ie, dpbrennan@justice.ie,   Leslie.Hamilton@taoiseach.gov.ie  Date:   17/01/2013 10:51  Subject:        Yesterday's Order of Business        Dear Deputy McNamara,     In yesterday's Order of Business you raised with An Tanaiste the Programme   for Government containing a commitment to ratify the convention on persons   with   a disability.On behalf of Minister Lynch I would like to clarify the   following. It is the Government's intention to ratify the UN Convention on   the Rights of Persons   with Disabilities as quickly as possible, taking into account the need to   ensure that all necessary legislative and administrative requirements   under the   Convention are being met. As you may be aware, Ireland does not become   party to treaties until it is first in a position to comply with the   obligations imposed   by the treaty in question, including by amending domestic law as     necessary. The ongoing implementation of our National Disability Strategy   in many respects   comprehends many of the provisions of the Convention. In addition, the   Inter-Departmental Committee on the Convention monitors the remaining   legislative   and administrative actions required to enable ratification. At the   Committee's request, the National Disability Authority, the lead statutory   agency for the   sector,is in the process of assisting it to assess the remaining   requirements for ratification so as to ensure conclusively that all such   issues will be addressed.   One of the key requirements in this regard is the enactment of capacity   legislation. The Programme for Government includes a commitment to   introduce a   Mental Capacity Bill that is in line with the UN Convention on the Rights   of Persons with Disabilities. Drafting of the bill is being finalised with   a view to publication   early in this Dail Session. The enactment of new legislation is one of the   core elements of the remaining work to be completed to enable ratification   by the State of   the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.       regards,     Adrian McLaughlin  Private Secretary to the  Minister for Disability, Equality, Mental Health & Older People  Department of Health  Hawkins House  Dublin 2      ********************************************************  Email Disclaimer & Legal Notice: http://www.dohc.ie/mail_disclaimer/  ********************************************************    Supporting The Gathering Ireland 2013 - www.thegatheringireland.com          Oireachtas email policy and disclaimer.  http://www.oireachtas.ie/parliament/about/oireachtasemailpolicyanddisclaimer/  Beartas ríomhphoist an Oireachtais agus séanadh.  http://www.oireachtas.ie/parliament/ga/eolas/beartasriomhphoistanoireachtaisagusseanadh/